![]() The so called "freeware" is a 30 day trial version. I suggest the removal of the AviTricks from the "Freeware" subtitle because the sofware is not free. He gives a links to a list of tutorials for using Blender as a non-linear video editor.ĭanylstrype ( talk) 07:28, 25 April 2016 (UTC) Reply Blender was what he finally turned to and he reports that it worked well as a video editor. He wrote that he tried a number of the packages on this page, including Pitivi, OpenShot, AVIDemux, and Cinelerra, and found them unusable. Chris Long, Senior Systems Engineer at Red Hat, wrote a blog last year about using video editing software on GNU/Linux. Please can we have some contributions from people that actually have more than a passing interest in this subject or is the article just a big advert ? - Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.234.59.247 ( talk) 22:58, 20 October 2011 (UTC) Reply I think Blender is appropriate for this list, perhaps more than some of the other applications listed here. Clock does not make Povray a video editor. I have used Povray for creating technical animations \ Movies since 1996 but it's not a video editor. I totally agree - Blender is a great program but does not belong in this section and shows a lack of technical moderation. It is not as usable as a dedicated Non Linear Editor such as Cinellera, but it does work. Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.253.229.77 ( talk) 21:18, 24 April 2008 (UTC) Reply īlender has a sequencer (video editor) built in (see and following pages). There are a LOT of other programs on the NLE lists that either are not for editing at all (Wax) or which are currently unusable for editing (Jahshaka). Liastnir 13:30, 13 June 2007 (UTC) Reply Blender has changed a lot since I used to use it regularly, and yes it does now include some quite useful video editing, details of which can be found at mmj ( talk) 04:58, 29 August 2008 (UTC) Reply I don't believe Blender is a video editing program in the sense the rest of these are. ( talk) 17:49, 28 April 2016 (UTC) Reply Possibility of Including Another Program Under "Video encoding and conversion tools" There is commercial free software, and there is commercial freeware, too.- J. I suggest a list like this:ĭanylstrype ( talk) 12:08, 28 April 2016 (UTC) Reply Commercial does not mean that it is not free/gratis. Considering the main reason a person would look for a list like this is to find software to use for a video-editing project, I think the order of significance is 1) libre/ proprietary, 2) client-side (desktop/ mobile)/ server-side, 3) gratis (free of charge)/ commercial. It seems to me that there are three distinctions a user needs to know about. Best regards, Codename Lisa ( talk) 11:04, 7 September 2012 (UTC) Reply The categorization here is still a bit confusing, since as ] says, there is free code software that is commercial, such as Kaltura. See )! - MaxBruckner 11:36, 07 September 2012 (UTC) Reply ĭone Hello. What is called "proprietary software" in this article should be called commercial software (and even this wouldn't be correct, since there is commercial open source software and commercial free software. The distinction between Freeware and proprietary software is void because Freeware is proprietary software. ![]() This one is more comparable to List of antivirus software or List of word processors.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |